Signal vs. WhatsApp: A Privacy Comparison

Image for illustration purposes | Signal vs. WhatsApp: A Privacy Comparison

---

Play to listen this Article

📌Also read | Telegram may banded in India: A Closer Look at the Potential Ban

In the digital age, privacy is a paramount concern for many users when choosing a messaging app. Signal and WhatsApp are two of the most popular messaging platforms, each with its own set of privacy features and policies. Here's a detailed comparison of how Signal stacks up against WhatsApp in terms of privacy.

Encryption Protocols:

Both Signal and WhatsApp employ end-to-end encryption to protect users' messages from being intercepted by third parties. This encryption is based on the Signal Protocol, which is considered one of the most secure encryption methods available.

📌Also read | Signal: A Messaging App Focused on Privacy and Security

Data Collection and Usage:

One of the main differences between Signal and WhatsApp is the amount and type of data they collect. Signal collects minimal user data and does not store messages on its servers. WhatsApp, while also employing end-to-end encryption, is owned by Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly Facebook), which has a history of collecting and using user data for advertising purposes.

Metadata Privacy:

Signal offers a unique feature called 'Sealed Sender,' which hides metadata, such as the sender and recipient's identities, from the messages. WhatsApp does not have a comparable feature, meaning that while the content of the messages is encrypted, certain metadata information is still accessible to the company.

📌Also read | OpenAI plans to launch text watermark tool for ChatGPT-generated content

User Identity Verification:

Both apps provide ways to verify the identities of the people you're communicating with, but Signal's method is more robust. Signal uses safety numbers that users can compare to verify the security of their conversations.

Backups and Cloud Storage:

Signal does not offer cloud backups, which means that if you lose your phone, you lose your chat history. This is seen as a privacy feature because your messages are not stored on a cloud server that could potentially be hacked. WhatsApp, on the other hand, offers cloud backups, but this means that messages are stored on cloud servers, which introduces potential privacy concerns.

Ownership and Business Model:

Signal is developed by the non-profit Signal Foundation and is funded by donations and grants. This means that Signal is not under pressure to monetize user data. WhatsApp, as part of Meta, operates under a business model that has historically involved the use of user data for targeted advertising.

📌Also read | What are the limitations of satellite internet?

Feature Comparison:

While Signal is lauded for its privacy features, it is often noted that WhatsApp offers more features overall. For example, WhatsApp allows users to share content directly with Instagram and Facebook, and it has a larger user base, which can be a significant factor for many people when choosing a messaging app.

In conclusion, for users who prioritize privacy above all else, Signal is generally considered the better choice. Its commitment to minimal data collection, metadata protection, and non-profit status make it a strong contender for the privacy-conscious. WhatsApp, while offering end-to-end encryption, falls short in terms of metadata privacy and its association with a company known for data collection practices. Ultimately, the choice between Signal and WhatsApp will depend on the individual's privacy priorities and their desired app features.

📌Also read | Exploring Messaging App Alternatives in India Amidst Telegram's Uncertain Future

🔽 RELATED VIDEO: Telegram may be banned in India ↴

📢Like this Article or have something to say? Write to us in the comment section, or connect with us on Facebook Threads Twitter LinkedIn using #TechRecevent.